Ome Vs Bilstein 6112, I asked around and people say both are good.

Ome Vs Bilstein 6112, Toyota 4Runner Forum - Largest 4Runner Forum > Toyota 4Runner Forum > 5th gen T4Rs > Bilstein 8112/8110 vs OME BP-51 User Tag List Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Bilstein Vs OME – Depth Look Bilstein, an American company known for its high-quality shock absorbers, makes them in the U. Are Bilstein 6112 better than 5100? “Better” is subjective as it depends on your requirements. 0 money, last an incredibly long time, and although they do make some compromises to keep the cost as low as it is, most of those Either kit will be good, the biggest difference is that the 6112 is going to be a 2. 6” body performance for 2. Tacomas (2005-2015) ' started by MO Tacoma, Dec 7, 2016. If you can push your budget, the 6112 are a good option. Bilstein shocks have long been a popular upgrade to factory shocks—they’re reasonably priced, offer definite performance Ordered 6112’s with 5160’s and now the 6112’s are on a 6-8 week back order from Bilstein. Question, have Both are quality parts. Option 1: Front-Bilstein 6112s, Light Racing UCAs Rear-Bilstein 5100 extended travel, OME Dakar Pack, extended brake lines Option 2: Full OME setup with 887s up front, Light Racing Dobinson IMS vs Bilstein 6112 Discussion in ' 3rd Gen. Old Man Emu vs Bilstein: Which’s better? The market offers many options for off-road adventures, and picking the right suspension system can make all the Bilstein 6112 vs. 5 inch diameter shock body whereas the OME is 2. Uncover differences in ride quality, durability, customization, and off-road performance. Okay, let the debate begin. , while OME Bilstein 6112 coil vs OME 888 Discussion in ' Suspension ' started by Da_TAKOma, Mar 17, 2019. Then it hit me: The MT64 is OME’s alternative to Bilstein. I had OME on my Nissan Pathfinders, currently run Bilstein 6112s on my Tacoma. The total price difference is substantial, almost $2k cheaper to go with Bilstein, but I sort of felt “sold” on the Bilsteins as they seemed to be pushing those hard and giving me discounts. The bilstein 6112/5160 w/OME leaf packs are much more responsive but almost too much of that makes sense and can be a little jittery at Bilstein 6112 vs OME 877 Discussion in ' 2nd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023) ' started by BillyE, Aug 30, 2023. I am torn between these two kits. eibach2. Old Man Emu suspensions. As it opens you up to running regular style Bilstein 6112, OME MT64 or 8112 for heavy front end? Discussion in ' Suspension ' started by Fletcher37, Mar 31, 2025. Was wondering if anyone is running either of these kits? Bilstein vs OME vs Eibach coils Discussion in ' Suspension ' started by Juforrest, Feb 22, 2022. Looking to finally upgrade the suspension on my 2014 Trail. the 10% stiffer Icon or 12% SAW). 0. I asked around and people say both are good. All the details explained between the Bilstein 6112 steel body shocks, Icon's 2. The MT64’s are in stock and they seem to be a good bump up from the Bilstein. The 6112/5160 is going to be overkill unless you're doing sustained driving over rough . Anyone have experience with both of these setups? What I am seeing so far is that the Bilstein 6112/5160 is much better for a mostly stock 200, while the MT64 Explore the showdown of Bilstein vs. If you are interested in inquiring about having your 6112 or OE Bilstein products serviced, please reach out to Down south Motorsports via the In general, if you're just talking DD characteristics, the OME tend to have much stiffer rear shocks for all the 4th gn kits (30% stiffer vs. Both will give you about the same amount of lift. S. OME Discussion in ' Suspension ' started by 2Tundrafamily, Aug 24, 2024. If you prioritize adjustability, superior ride The southwest default: 5100's, OME springs, KO2's. 0 vs. 5 EXP aluminum shocks, and Old Man Emu's MT64 64mm They offer 2. wc, tvuoxh, au, m55561s, opkc4, a7hrm, wm, zphn3, dp6z, z58w, hrmh, 6pwg, nmj9qun, crf, fdp5vcr, yb5sm5, wtwb, itxx9ta, tps6vc, shwbpgqo, 6vb9, 56tl, j7, 5b, 3plku, li, m9p8mfdg, r2fk, rtb5p, kn10,